Source: sjvwater.org
Kern River charm offensive hits a bar at agency meeting
Fetched 2026-07-08 08:00 from sjvwater.org
Reading Summary (AI-generated)
Reading Summary: Kern River Charm Offensive
Key Facts
- Bring Back the Kern is conducting a tour of Kern River rights holders’ board meetings, asking them to support a more consistently flowing river through Bakersfield.
- Kern County Water Agency Board President Marty Milobar pushed back sharply, defending agricultural water rights dating to the 1880s and dismissing environmental benefits (“so you can see a toad or something”).
- Milobar previously served as General Manager of Buena Vista Water Storage District (1984–2008), one of the ag districts currently in litigation with Bring Back the Kern — a notable conflict-of-interest angle.
- The City of Bakersfield holds a river right that expires at the end of July 2025, after which the river through town will likely go dry again.
- The California Supreme Court granted a petition to review the 5th District Court of Appeal ruling in July 2025; arguments may be heard in September 2026, with the underlying case scheduled for trial in February 2027.
Who Is Affected
- Agricultural districts with Kern River rights: Buena Vista Water Storage District, Kern Delta Water District, North Kern Water Storage District, Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District
- City of Bakersfield — rights holder, river operator, and legal defendant
- Bakersfield residents and families using the river corridor (Yokuts Park events)
- Aquatic ecosystems and fish dependent on minimum flows through the city
Policy/Legal Angle
- Public Trust Doctrine — central legal theory in the 2022 lawsuit filed by Bring Back the Kern and Water Audit California, arguing Bakersfield failed to account for environmental and recreational values in river operations
- 2023 preliminary injunction (Judge Gregory Pulskamp) required minimum flows for fish; overturned April 2025 by the 5th District Court of Appeal for lack of a specific finding on adequate flow volume
- California Supreme Court accepted review in July 2025 — this case could produce significant statewide precedent on how the Public Trust Doctrine applies to long-established river water rights
Blog Angles
-
Conflict of interest at the dais? Milobar spent 24 years running Buena Vista Water Storage District — a party to the litigation — before becoming board president of the agency he now represents. How does that history shape the agency’s posture, and does it raise governance concerns worth scrutinizing?
-
The Public Trust Doctrine on trial: If the California Supreme Court hears arguments in September 2026, this could be a landmark ruling. What would a pro-Public Trust outcome mean for other over-appropriated rivers in the San Joaquin Valley where ag rights also date to the 1800s?
-
The charm offensive as organizing strategy: Bring Back the Kern got a warm reception from the Bakersfield Water Committee but a cold one from KCWA. Which rights holders are genuinely persuadable, and could any defections from the ag coalition shift the legal or political dynamics before the 2027 trial?
Full Text
Kern River charm offensive hits a bar at agency meeting
An effort to find common ground in the waters of the Kern River ran into a bar late last month at the Kern County Water Agency meeting, specifically Board President Marty Milobar. Members of Bring Back the Kern have been visiting the boards of entities with rights to the Kern River to applaud the currently flowing river through town, note the resurgence of wildlife and remind board members how the water brings families to its banks.
Bring Back the Kern is asking river rights holders to “…be part of the solution to create a better river for our city and our whole community,” spokesperson Kelly Damian said to the Kern County Water Agency board during its June 25 meeting. The Kern County Water Agency owns a high-flow right, meaning it gets water when the river is running at 125% of normal.
“This is a public agency that gets at least some of its funding from the public with a board elected by the public,” she said. “We’re asking you to really represent the public on this issue and create a good solution for the river so it’s not just a once-in-a-while river, but a regular river.”
The approach received a warm reception at the Bakersfield Water Committee meeting in June.
Not so much at the Kern County Water Agency.
“Several of our member units (agricultural water districts) have Kern River water rights that go back to 1880s,” Board President Milobar said after Damian was done. “Those rights support hundreds, or thousands of families that work in ag. To take that water away from farms so you can see a toad or something is pretty tough on these Kern River rights districts.”
He said the agency represents those ag districts as well as the rest of the community.
“We understand if the city wants to run their water down the river, that’s their choice. They can do that. For other rights holders it’s different. That’s my comment.”
Before being elected to the Kern County Water Agency, Milobar served as General Manager of the Buena Vista Water Storage District from 1984 to 2008. Buena Vista is one of the ag districts with Kern River rights that, along with the other rights holders, is embroiled in a legal fight with Bring Back the Kern.
The other rights holders include Kern Delta Water District and the City of Bakersfield. North Kern Water Storage District has a contractual right to water and the Rosedale-Rio Bravo Water Storage District owns a right on the South Fork of the Kern River above Lake Isabella.
The city not only owns a river right, it is also the official record keeper of river flows and water deliveries for all rights holders and it operates the river based on a long history of settlements, decrees and contracts.
In 2022, Bring Back the Kern and Water Audit California sued the city over those operations saying it was derelict by not considering the Public Trust. That doctrine demands water be used to its greatest benefit, including for the environment and recreation.
A temporary injunction had required water in the river for fish but was overturned and the river through Bakersfield went dry again. Bring Back the Kern appealed to the California Supreme Court, which may hear the issue as early as this September.
Sunset events on the river
There is no cost and no need to register. The group is welcoming the public to come out and enjoy a number of activities including rubber duck races, building “cork boats” to float on the flows, scavenger hunts and, of course water fights.
The events will be held July 9, 16, 23 and 30 from 6:30 to 8 p.m.
After that, the City of Bakersfield’s right to Kern River water ends and the river will likely be dry through town again.
To celebrate a flowing river through Bakersfield – at least until the end of this month – local group Bring Back the Kern is holding family-friendly events at Yokuts Park every Thursday evening.
Kern River lawsuit timeline
-
2022 – Lawsuit filed against Bakersfield alleging it has been derelict in its operation of the river, leaving it dry through the city most of the time.
-
2023 – Kern County Superior Court Judge Gregory Pulskamp issues a preliminary injunction requiring the city to keep enough water in the river for fish.
-
April 2025 – Injunction overturned by 5th District Court of Appeal because Pulskamp didn’t make a finding of how much water was needed to keep fish in good condition.
-
July 2025 – State Supreme Court grants petition to review 5th District ruling.
-
Sept. 2026 – Supreme Court may hear arguments.
-
The underlying case continues moving forward, now scheduled to be heard by Pulskamp in February 2027.