Source: www.acwa.com

San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Board Reduces Property Tax Rate

Fetched 2026-07-24 08:01 from www.acwa.com

Reading Summary (AI-generated)

Reading Summary: San Bernardino Valley MWD Board Reduces Property Tax Rate

Key Facts

The Board unanimously voted to cut the annual property tax rate by nearly 64%, from $0.11 to $0.04 per $100 of assessed value
The reduction will leave approximately $60 million in taxpayers’ hands this year, against a projected ~$100 million in annual SWP costs
San Bernardino Valley MWD is the 5th largest of 29 State Water Contractors, with an annual entitlement of up to 102,600 acre-feet/year (enough for 300,000+ households)
Alternative revenue sources enabling the cut include funds from dissolved Redevelopment Agencies and earned interest income
The district serves ~734,000 people across 353 square miles in southwestern San Bernardino County, supplying 15 retail agencies

Who Is Affected

Property owners within the district’s service area (Fontana to Calimesa)
15 retail water agencies receiving wholesale water
Communities in southwestern San Bernardino County and a portion of Riverside County

Policy/Legal Angle

Property tax authority was voter-authorized in the 1960s specifically to fund SWP obligations; taxes are legally restricted to that purpose
The district operates under a State Water Contract with the Department of Water Resources (DWR)
Funded infrastructure includes Oroville Dam, San Luis Reservoir, the California Aqueduct, and Lake Silverwood
Revenue from Redevelopment Agency dissolutions (a legacy of California’s 2011 RDA elimination) is now being redirected to offset tax burden

Blog Angles

The RDA windfall question: How much dissolved Redevelopment Agency money is flowing to water agencies statewide, and is this a sustainable or one-time revenue offset that masks future rate shock?
SWP cost transparency: With ~$100M in annual SWP costs and large infrastructure projects still in the permitting pipeline, what happens to the tax rate when those projects break ground — and are ratepayers being given a realistic long-term picture?
Equity and governance model: The district operates as a wholesale agency serving 15 retailers across a large, diverse region — does a reduced property tax rate translate into actual savings for end users, or do retail agency markups absorb the benefit?

Full Text

San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Board Reduces Property Tax Rate

by San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District
Member Submitted News

SAN BERNANDINO – The San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Board of Directors unanimously voted to lower the Agency’s annual property tax rate by nearly 64%, landing at $0.04 per $100 of assessed value. The regional water agency and State Water Contractor bring supplemental water supplies from Northern California into its 353 square mile service area, providing water to 15 retail agencies who serve homes and businesses. In most years, approximately 75% of water is sourced from existing local surface and groundwater supplies, while 25% is imported from Northern California through the state’s water conveyance network to meet local water needs, a system known as the State Water Project (SWP).

Each year, the Board sets the annual property tax rate after a thorough review of current State Water Project costs, debt, and long-range infrastructure needs. President T. Milford Harrison stated, “For more than 70 years, we have been careful stewards of taxpayer dollars and our region’s water future. This vote continues that legacy of making decisions that ensure reliable water for residents today and for future generations.”

San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District is the fifth largest of the 29 State Water Contractors who fund the infrastructure and have an annual entitlement of up to 102,600 acre-feet of water per year, enough to supply over 300,000 households for a year. The property taxes collected each year by San Bernardino Valley were authorized by voters in the 1960’s to pay for costs of the SWP; infrastructure which includes Oroville Dam, San Luis Reservoir, the California Aqueduct, and nearby Lake Silverwood. San Bernardino Valley serves water to agencies spanning from Fontana to Calimesa. Property taxes are restricted to funding the Agency’s obligations associated with the State Water Contract.

“Following an extensive economic analysis of the current and forecasted State Water Project costs as well as our available financial resources, the Board was able to significantly lower the property tax rate this year,” said Director Susan Longville, the longest serving member of the Board and member of the Agency’s Cost of Service Study Committee. “I am proud that we are able to lower our portion of property tax costs, while remaining committed to ensuring the long-term water supply resiliency for this region.”

The Board approved a rate of $0.04 per $100 of assessed property valuation, down from the previous rate of $0.11, a reduction that reflects the Board’s continued commitment to easing costs for property owners by relying on other sources of funding to continue the Agency’s work; including funds received following the dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies and the Agency’s earned interest. Reducing the amount of property tax collected will leave nearly $60 million in the hands of taxpayers this year.

Director Jose Velasquez who made the motion to approve the new rate of $0.04, stated, “Due to prudent decisions by past Boards over many years, along with new sources of revenue and smart investments, the Agency is now in a position to provide significant savings to the taxpayers. Bringing our property tax rate as low as possible right now, while we continue to plan and permit large infrastructure projects is a strategic decision by this Board that directly benefits the people we serve.”

The Agency projects approximately $100 million in costs this year on the SWP. The Board considered the feasibility of using alternative sources of revenue while also ensuring that sufficient revenue would be generated to meet its obligations under its State Water Project contract with the Department of Water Resources. In his statements during the meeting, Director Paul Kielhold acknowledged that there are many factors in water supply planning and delivery that the Agency and Board cannot control. In fact, setting the tax rate is one of the only things that the Board directly controls and they try to find the right balance between ensuring there is enough funding for future projects while also keeping water affordable today. The investment pays for infrastructure built to serve the region for 50 to 100 years, providing a reliable, imported water supply for decades to come.

Vice President Gil Botello stated of the decision, “We know this work is hard and requires bold decisions providing benefits well into the future. But these decisions strengthen the foundation from which the Agency was formed by the voters in 1954. Our Board is independently elected by the voters in our service area to represent their interests. We accomplished that with our decision by recognizing our obligations to future water supply projects while also acknowledging the financial burdens our taxpayers experience.”

Workshop materials and the full Board action are available on the Agency’s website at www.sbvmwd.com .

About San Bernardino Valley

San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District is a regional wholesale water agency serving approximately 734,000 people across 353 square miles in southwestern San Bernardino County and a small portion of Riverside County. Through regional partnerships, innovative projects, and a dedicated team of professionals, San Bernardino Valley is committed to building a resilient and sustainable water supply future for the communities it serves. Learn more at www.sbvmwd.com .

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Comment Letter regarding Draft State Fiscal Year 2026-27 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund […]

Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Subject: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Rescission of Regulatory Determinations and Removal of Related Provisions for […]

Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Subject: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Extending the Compliance Deadline for the PFOA and PFOS Maximum Contaminant […]

Agency: U.S. Office of Management and Budget Subject: U.S. Office of Management and Budget: Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance — […]

Sorry, but only ACWA members have permission to view this content. Member login is required.

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Control of Lead and Copper Regulation and AB 1096 Policy Handbook Letter excerpt: […]

Agency: California Air Resources Board Subject: Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation Amendments/Additional 15-Day Changes Letter excerpt: The Association of California Water […]

To: Senate President pro Tempore Limón, Assembly Speaker Rivas, Budget Chairs Laird and Gabriel, and Subcommittee Chairs Gómez Reyes and […]

Agency: California Air Resources Board Subject: Pre-Rulemaking on Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage/Carbon Dioxide Removal Program Letter excerpt: The Association […]

To: Thomas Lombardi, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, Standards and Risk Management Division Subject: […]

To: Budget Chairs John Laird and Jesse Gabriel, and Subcommittee Chairs Eloise Gomez Reyes and Steve Bennett Subject: River Forecast […]

The following document is released each month and includes policy updates from ACWA’s Regulatory Department. Click on the below link […]

Agency: State Water Resources Control Board Subject: Draft DDW Post Wildfire Resources Letter excerpt: The Association of California Water Agencies […]

Presentations from ACWA’s 2026 Spring Conference held May 5-7 in Sacramento are available below. The designated conference sessions that were […]

Among countless highlights during my time at ACWA, one that stands out took place not in Sacramento, or even California, […]

Contra Costa Water District (CCWD) is thriving as it celebrates 90 years of securing a reliable supply of high-quality water […]

PERRIS — Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) has been recognized for its industry-leading efforts to provide excellent value to its […]

SAN BERNANDINO – The San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District Board of Directors unanimously voted to lower the Agency’s annual […]

SCV Water will soon begin a conversion project to expand the use of recycled water in Santa Clarita to Fair […]

Six student artists were recognized as the winners of the Otay Water District’s 2026 “Being Water Wise is…” Student Poster […]

BIOLA — For the first time, surface water from Fresno Irrigation District’s (FID) Herndon Canal is flowing into the Biola […]

WALNUT — Walnut Valley Water District (WVWD) is proud to announce its recognition as a contributing utility in the Alliance […]

For nearly three decades, Eric Smith has helped shape the culture, operations, and people of Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD). As he prepares […]

Irvine Ranch Water District Board President Steve LaMar has joined the ranks of California governors, senators, environmental nonprofits and globally […]

VALLEY CENTER — The Valley Center Municipal Water District is deeply saddened to announce that former General Manager, Gary T. […]

Past ACWA Board member and longtime California water leader, Gary Arant, has passed away. In a July 16 announcement, San […]

SACRAMENTO – Before demolishing two vacant District-owned buildings, Sacramento Suburban Water District (SSWD) partnered with the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (Metro […]

PERRIS — Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)’s commitment to financial excellence on behalf of its customers has helped it maintain […]

The ACWA Foundation will host a Central Valley Water Careers Pathways Symposium on Sept. 24 to expand awareness of water […]